Reply to comment

A point of critique of the article and vote swapping.

There's wide disagree on whether voting Clinton is privileged or not. A lot of articles have been written on the issue. I'm not gonna address that in detail in my comment. I think it's complicated, especially growing up Muslim in America as a working class person or color. But I will make a comment or two:

While the "most progressive platform" talking point is an exaggeration paraded around this year, it's fair to note that the Dems lost *catatrophically* in 1972. And while we can get into a debate about why exactly that was, it *is* clear that when put to the voter by proxy of McGovern in *practice* voters *overwhelmingly* turned it down. It failed to get over with the public.

That said, I don't think voting 3rd Party/Green is a wasted vote this year. Though I do believe that anyone in a safe state helps the Green Party more by vote swapping with someone in a swing state. *Right now* at Trump Traders (trumptraders.com), you can get two Stein votes for one HRC vote. So it reduces Trump chances of winning *and* raises 3rd party voting. There's also the idea of making private agreements with with friends from swing states, the #NeverTrump vote swapping app and the makeminecount.org website.

I know some people will oppose vote trading, probably on deontological ethical grounds. (a.k.a *any* vote for Clinton is bad automatically). But on practical grounds you can't deny the benefit it also brings to the Greens. So I'm more the willing to do it.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <b> </b> <br> <br /> <a> </a> <em> </em> <strong> </strong> <cite> </cite> <code> </code> <ul> </ul> <ol> </ol> <li> </li> <dl> </dl> <dt> </dt> <dd> </dd> <div> </div> <img> <style> <font> </font> <blockquote> </blockquote> <hr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.